S&P GLOBAL

Creating deals from emails with AI

TL // DR

Deal teams spend hours manually finding and copying data from emails and documents into their deal tracking systems. I designed a feature that uses AI to Auto-create and enrich deals from emails and documents, saving clients hours every week by reducing tedious busy-work and context-switching.

ROLE

Product Design Lead

Endless busy-work

Deal teams spend hours manually finding and copying data from emails and documents into their deal tracking systems. This context switching and tedious data entry takes away time from more valuable tasks like decision-making and finding new deals.

30+ minutes
30+ mins

to populate data for a new deal

to populate data for a new deal

10-20+
10-20+

deals per week for analysts to log

deals per week for analysts to log

New tech, familiar tools

To address this, we designed a feature that uses AI to Auto-create and enrich deals from emails and documents. This allows customers to:

  • Save time by eliminating manual data entry.

  • Stay in context by letting users operate directly from email.

This feature not only aligned with S&P’s business goal of showcasing technological leadership through AI, but also would differentiate our product in a saturated, mature market by targeting Deal Team members' workflows.

Kickoff mechanism

Early on, our team had conflicting ideas about how users should start the data extraction process. To create alignment and chart a clear path forward, I explored and sketched three possible solutions:

Scan an email and its attachments directly in Outlook, preview and edit the deal, then push into iLEVEL Deals.

PROS

Stays completely in the context of Outlook

CONS

High development complexity, requires add-in setup

Scan an email and its attachments directly in Outlook, preview and edit the deal, then push into iLEVEL Deals.

PROS

Stays completely in the context of Outlook

CONS

High development complexity, requires add-in setup

After discussing tradeoffs across design, product, and engineering, we aligned on using the forward-to-email method. It was the most technically feasible, required the least amount of user setup to get started.

Review entry points

However, we now faced two new challenges: the kickoff process lived in a different location from the review process, and our dev team confirmed that AI processing could take 5–10 minutes. This raised key questions: where would users go to find deals awaiting review, and how could we make the waiting period feel manageable? To explore this, we tested low-fidelity designs for several potential entry points with clients, including:

A dedicated “to review” section in the deal list.

A dedicated “to review” section in the deal list.

A dedicated “to review” section in the deal list.

Clients were split between the In-Situ and Menu options. Those with a standard, habitually filtered pipeline view preferred the In-Situ option, since changes would stand out in the view they’re already accustomed to. Others preferred the Menu option for its more explicit, list-like presentation.

I can see at a glance which items need my attention, in the place I'm used to seeing them.

I can see at a glance which items need my attention, in the place I'm used to seeing them.

— Interviewee on the In-Situ option

— Interviewee on the In-Situ option

I like that it's like a to-do list — I'll want to keep my 'inbox' at 0.

I like that it's like a to-do list — I'll want to keep my 'inbox' at 0.

— Interviewee on the Menu option

— Interviewee on the Menu option

Final iteration

For our final design, we incorporated both the In-Situ and Menu designs. Here are some highlights:

End-to-end flow

Automated email designs for keeping users updated on system progress without needing to login and sacrifice the email workflow context

Processing badge animation

AI review menu to track AI processes the user's kicked off and begin reviewing

AI review process

Keyboard navigation guidelines for accessibility

Conclusion

Although this project has not released yet, we've already had commercial impacts from our designs alone:

100%

of our beta clients anticipated regularly using this feature

60%

of our annual client conference attendees signed up for a sales demo

Once released, some key metrics I'm using to measure success will be:

% of all new deals made that were made via email

Does this feature truly save our clients time, or are other methods more efficient? Are there specific client types that love this feature, and others that don't touch it?

# of users that copy the email address

Is this feature discoverable, or should we make it more prominent?

% of extracted data rejected, corrected, dismissed, or accepted

Are AI-generated deals unreliable / insufficient? Are users dropping off at any point before completing deal creation?

© Alexa Bren, 2025

© Alexa Bren, 2025

© Alexa Bren, 2025